Distinct fibroblast subpopulations associated with bone, brain or intrapulmonary metastasis in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Bone or brain metastases may develop in 20-40% of individuals with late-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), resulting in a median overall survival of only 4-6 months. However, the primary lung cancer tissue's distinctions between bone, brain and intrapulmonary metastases of NSCLC at the single-cell level have not been underexplored. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive analysis of 14 tissue biopsy samples obtained from treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC patients with bone (n = 4), brain (n = 6) or intrapulmonary (n = 4) metastasis using single-cell sequencing originating from the lungs. Following quality control and the removal of doublets, a total of 80 084 cells were successfully captured. RESULTS: The most significant inter-group differences were observed in the fraction and function of fibroblasts. We identified three distinct cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) subpopulations: myofibroblastic CAF (myCAF), inflammatory CAF (iCAF) and antigen-presenting CAF (apCAF). Notably, apCAF was prevalent in NSCLC with bone metastasis, while iCAF dominated in NSCLC with brain metastasis. Intercellular signalling network analysis revealed that apCAF may play a role in bone metastasis by activating signalling pathways associated with cancer stemness, such as SPP1-CD44 and SPP1-PTGER4. Conversely, iCAF was found to promote brain metastasis by activating invasion and metastasis-related molecules, such as MET hepatocyte growth factor. Furthermore, the interaction between CAFs and tumour cells influenced T-cell exhaustion and signalling pathways within the tumour microenvironment. CONCLUSIONS: This study unveils the direct interplay between tumour cells and CAFs in NSCLC with bone or brain metastasis and identifies potential therapeutic targets for inhibiting metastasis by disrupting these critical cell-cell interactions.

Efficacy and safety of durvalumab + chemotherapy vs. atezolizumab + chemotherapy in the treatment of small­cell lung cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Background: Durvalumab and atezolizumab have recently been approved in extensive small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with moderate median overall survival (OS) improvements. However, only limited data exist regarding the impact of immunotherapy in real-world SCLC patients. This study sought to assess the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and durvalumab plus chemotherapy in the treatment of SCLC in a real-world setting. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all patients treated for SCLC with chemotherapy with PD-L1 inhibitor, at 3 centers in China between February 1, 2020 and April 30, 2022. Patient characteristics, adverse-events and survival analyses were conducted. Results: A total of 143 patients were enrolled in this study, 100 were treated with durvalumab and the remainder with atezolizumab. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were fundamentally balanced before using PD-L1 inhibitors (P>0.05). The median OS (mOS) of the patients who received durvalumab or atezolizumab as the first-line treatment were 22.0 and 10.0 months, respectively (P=0.03). Survival analysis of patients with brain metastasis (BM) revealed that the median progression-free survival (mPFS) of patients without BM treated with durvalumab plus chemotherapy (5.5 months) was longer than that of those with BM (4.0 months) (P=0.03). In contrast, in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy regimen, BM did not affect survival. In addition, the addition of radiotherapy to treatment with PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy has a tendency to improve long-term survival. As for safety analysis, there was no significant difference in the incidence of immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) during PD-L1 inhibitor therapy between the 2 groups (P>0.05). And during treatment with immunochemotherapy, radiotherapy was not associated with the development of IRAE (P=0.42) but increased the risk of immune-related pneumonitis (P=0.026). Conclusions: The implication of this study for clinical practice is a preference for durvalumab in first-line immunotherapy for SCLC. In addition, appropriate radiotherapy during treatment with PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy may prolong long-term survival, but the occurrence of immune-related pneumonitis should be vigilant. Data from this study are limited and the baseline characteristics of the two populations still need to be more finely classified.

Real-world data on efficacy and safety of osimertinib in non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR T790M mutation detected by first and repeat rebiopsy.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib could effectively target epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M resistance mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), indicating that rebiopsy may be particularly important. However, the clinical benefit of repeat rebiopsy in T790M-negative patients with NSCLC detected by the first rebiopsy is still unclear, and data on the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in patients with NSCLC who are T790M-positive patients on a repeat rebiopsy remain rare. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of advanced NSCLC patients with common EGFR mutation who were treated with 1/2-generation (1/2G) EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in first-line therapy in our center from January 2018 to December 2020. The detection rate of T790M by first and repeat rebiopsy was recorded, and we also analyzed the efficacy and safety of osimertinib for T790M-positive patients. RESULTS: Among 190 common EGFR-mutant patients who received 1/2G EGFR-TKIs with advanced NSCLC in the first-line treatment, 141 patients developed progressive disease. In total, 110 of 141 accepted the first rebiopsy, with a T790M prevalence of 50.9% (56/110). In total, 43 T790M-positive patients who received osimertinib were included in first rebiopsy group. Of 54 T790M-negative patients detected by the first rebiopsy, 28 underwent repeated rebiopsy in subsequent clinical treatment, and 10 (35.7%) T790M-positive cases were confirmed. In total, eight T790M-positive patients treated with osimertinib were included in repeat rebiopsy group. Overall, 66 (60%) of 110 patients acquired a T790M mutation. In patients with the T790M mutation discovered by the first and repeat rebiopsy, osimertinib resulted in median progression-free survival of 7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.3-8.7) and 6 (95% CI: 4.7-7.3) months, respectively (p = .656). The median overall survival since osimertinib initiation for T790M-positive patients at first rebiopsy was 20 (95% CI: 15.1-24.9) months and 19 (95% CI: 16.9-21.1) months, for those at repeated rebiopsy (p = .888). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were similar in the two groups (25.6% vs. 12.5%, p = .616). There was no treatment-related death in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat rebiopsy can increase the T790M mutation positivity rate. Osimertinib showed similar efficacy and safety in T790M-positive patients whether detected by the first or repeat rebiopsy.